How to Mitigate Risks in Corporate Mergers and Acquisitions

Mergers and acquisitions (M&A) are strategic decisions that can significantly transform a company’s growth trajectory. However, these transactions are fraught with legal and litigation risks that can derail the deal or result in costly post-transaction consequences. The legal complexities surrounding mergers and acquisitions require careful consideration to avoid litigation risks and ensure compliance with all applicable laws and regulations. 

Legal Liabilities and Unresolved Issues

One of the most significant legal risks in M&A transactions is the potential for unresolved liabilities or legal disputes that could affect the acquiring company after the deal is closed. This may include outstanding litigation, regulatory violations, or unresolved contractual obligations of the target company.

The target company may be involved in ongoing lawsuits, arbitration, or regulatory investigations that could expose the acquiring company to legal liabilities. These cases might involve significant claims, such as intellectual property infringement, breach of contract, or employee disputes.

Comprehensive due diligence is the cornerstone of mitigating litigation risks. During due diligence, the acquiring company should conduct a thorough review of the target company’s pending or threatened litigation. This includes evaluating the nature and potential outcomes of ongoing cases, assessing the financial impact, and determining whether the target company’s insurance coverage or indemnification provisions will provide protection against these claims.

Additionally, the acquiring company may seek warranties and representations from the target company regarding the absence of undisclosed litigation or liabilities. The deal agreement should include provisions that address indemnification for any legal claims that arise post-transaction.

Regulatory and Compliance Risks

In many jurisdictions, mergers and acquisition transactions are subject to scrutiny by competition authorities to assess whether the deal will create monopolies or significantly reduce competition in the market. Regulatory bodies, such as the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) or the European Commission, may challenge the transaction if they perceive anti-competitive effects.

To mitigate the risk of antitrust challenges, acquiring companies should engage in a pre-transaction antitrust review to evaluate how the merger or acquisition could affect competition in the relevant market. Companies can work with antitrust experts to determine whether the transaction would likely face regulatory hurdles or opposition. In some cases, early engagement with regulatory authorities can help clarify potential concerns and allow for remedial actions, such as divestitures or restructuring of the deal, to satisfy competition regulators.

Post-Transaction Litigation Risks  

Even after an M&A transaction is completed, litigation risks can arise if disputes emerge regarding the interpretation of deal terms, breaches of warranties, or performance expectations.

Breach of Contract Claims within Mergers and Acquisitions

Post-transaction litigation can arise if there are disputes regarding the terms and conditions of the M&A agreement. This could involve disagreements over price adjustments, the fulfillment of performance targets, or the breach of representations and warranties made by either party during negotiations.

The M&A agreement should be carefully crafted with clear terms to minimize the potential for future litigation. Representations and warranties should be detailed and comprehensive, covering key issues such as the target’s financial health, intellectual property ownership, and compliance with laws. It is also crucial to include dispute resolution clauses, such as arbitration or mediation, to handle any disagreements that arise post-transaction.

Indemnity and Escrow Provisions within Mergers and Acquisitions

Incorporating indemnity clauses into the deal agreement can protect the acquiring company from certain post-transaction liabilities. Indemnification provisions require the seller to compensate the buyer for losses resulting from breaches of warranties, misrepresentations, or other liabilities that were not disclosed during due diligence.

Ensure that indemnity clauses are clearly defined in the M&A agreement, specifying the scope, duration, and limitations of indemnification. Escrow accounts can also be established as a safeguard, with a portion of the purchase price held in escrow to cover potential liabilities or claims that arise post-closing. This provides financial security for the acquiring company in case of legal issues.

Intellectual Property Risks in M&A 

Intellectual property (IP) assets often play a key role in the value of a target company, particularly in industries such as technology, pharmaceuticals, and entertainment. However, IP-related legal risks can emerge if the target company’s IP rights are not properly assigned or if there are disputes over ownership.

A target company may have unclear ownership of its intellectual property or may be involved in ongoing IP litigation, such as patent infringement or copyright disputes. These issues can be inherited by the acquiring company and may affect its ability to use or enforce the acquired IP.

Conduct a thorough IP due diligence to identify all intellectual property assets, including patents, trademarks, copyrights, and trade secrets. Ensure that the target company has clear title to its IP and that all licenses and agreements are reviewed for potential restrictions or encumbrances. The M&A agreement should include representations regarding IP ownership and warranty provisions that protect the acquiring company from any future IP-related disputes.

Employment and Labor Risks  

Employment-related legal risks can complicate M&A transactions, especially if the target company has complex employee relations issues, such as union agreements, employee disputes, or potential labor violations.

Mergers and acquisitions often result in significant changes to employee benefits, compensation plans, and retirement programs. In some cases, employees may claim that the transaction violates their rights under labor laws, or disputes may arise regarding the assumption of pension liabilities.

Carefully review the target company’s employee contracts, benefit plans, and pension liabilities during due diligence. Address any employment-related liabilities in the transaction agreement, and ensure that employees are informed and treated fairly during the transition. If necessary, work with labor attorneys to develop strategies to address union negotiations or potential employee disputes.

Stay up to date in your M&A practice with Continuing Education of the Bar (CEB)  

CEB provides a range of online services designed to enhance legal practice, including Practitioner, CEB’s all-in-one legal research solution with authoritative practice guides. Practitioner is meticulously crafted by California lawyers for California lawyers, providing comprehensive insights and resources tailored to your specific needs. All practice guides seamlessly integrate with CEB’s primary law research tool, empowering you to delve into California, Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, and U.S. Supreme Court case law, alongside California statutes and the California Constitution. As part of the Practitioner subscription, you gain access to DailyNews, ensuring you stay updated on any critical new cases or developments in your field. And don’t forget, Practitioner also includes TrueCite®, CEB’s powerful case law citator, enhancing your research efficiency and accuracy.

Our tools offer unparalleled support in case law research, legal analysis, and staying updated with the latest judicial decisions. By choosing CEB, you gain access to a wealth of knowledge, enabling you to navigate complex legal landscapes with confidence and precision.